Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00515
Original file (BC 2014 00515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00515

	XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 11 Jun 12, 4 Sept 12, and 29 May 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was diagnosed with Asthma after her third FA failure.  This pre-existing medical condition precluded her from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating for each FA.

In support of her appeal the applicant submits medical documentation validating her condition; an incomplete AF Form 108; and two letters, signed by her medical provider and section commander, indicating that she did in fact have a medical condition and also requesting removal of the contested FAs. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 October 2013, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering an error or injustice.

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he or she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF).  However, the test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FAs dated 11 Jun 12, 4 Sept 12, and 29 May 13. Specifically, the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

_______________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations; however, for the reasons noted below the Board recommends excusing the applicant’s failure to exhaust other administrative remedies.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  Although the applicant has failed to exhaust the existing subordinate levels of review prior to seeking relief before this Board, we find a sufficient basis to remove the contested FAs.  We note the applicant submitted medical documentation validating her condition, as well as a letter from her medical provider indicating that her condition affected her performance and recommending that the three contested FAs be invalidated.  Moreover, she provided a “Commander Invalidation Memorandum,” signed by her section commander, who recognizes the medical provider’s evaluation and requests that the FAs be removed from her records.  Since this is sufficient evidence to grant the application, there would be nothing to be gained by insisting that the applicant apply for subordinate review. Therefore, being mindful of administrative economy, we recommend her records be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessments, dated dated 11 Jun 12, 4 Sept 12, and 29 May 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00515 in Executive Session on 24 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXX, Chair
	XXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXX, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Feb 14, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Mar 14 w/atchs.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 14.
	

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00787

    Original file (BC 2014 00787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05191

    Original file (BC 2013 05191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03249

    Original file (BC 2013 03249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FAAB removed the duplicate FA, dated 21 Jan 07 from the AFFMS but found insufficient evidence to warrant removal of the FAs, dated 15 Jul 12 and 10 Feb 13, and denied this portion of the request. The applicant’s last nine FA results are as follows: Date Days Since Last Test Composite Score Rating 9 Feb 14 62 46.90 Unsatisfactory 8 Dec 13 146 72.80 Unsatisfactory 14 Jul 13 69 7.50 Unsatisfactory 5 May 13 83 67.90 Unsatisfactory *10 Feb 13 27 46.90 Unsatisfactory 13 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05060

    Original file (BC 2013 05060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation dated 18 Oct 13. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174

    Original file (BC 2013 01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00091

    Original file (BC 2013 00091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her appeal the applicant submits medical documentation and a medical determination letter signed by her medical provider indicating that she did in fact have a medical condition that precluded her from passing the contested FAs. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02521

    Original file (BC 2013 02521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Along with his personal statement, the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider that validates he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. On that same memorandum, the applicant’s medical provider indicated he had a “documented medical condition that precluded him/her from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” IAW AFI 36-2905; Atch 1, Para 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00081

    Original file (BC 2013 00081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01087

    Original file (BC 2013 01087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Nov 13 79.00 Satisfactory 26 Jul 13 77.20 Unsatisfactory 1 Mar 13 EXEMPT EXEMPT 31 Dec 12 23.75 Unsatisfactory *10 Sept 12 64.67 Unsatisfactory 27 Feb 12 78.30 Satisfactory *15 Nov 11 68.20 Unsatisfactory *12 May 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...